Richard Ferriss
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
948
29
5
2
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 5 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Richard Ferriss's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Richard Ferriss typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 2 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Richard Ferriss's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Richard Ferriss typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Maintenance Issues13
Landlord Win Rate: 30.77%
- Property Damage12
Landlord Win Rate: 58.33%
- Persistent Late Payment11
Landlord Win Rate: 81.82%
- Tenant Agreed Termination11
Landlord Win Rate: 45.45%
- Other10
Landlord Win Rate: 40%
- Harassment9
Landlord Win Rate: 66.67%
Unlock Full Access to Richard Ferriss's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Richard Ferriss typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Ottawa tenants awarded $7,583 after their landlord's failure to inform them about using a dehumidifier led to a severe mould infestation.
LTB denies a review request from a man who shares the same name as an evicted tenant, leaving him unable to clear his name despite claims of mistaken identity.
Landlord's eviction application for noise and dog complaints is dismissed after the LTB finds the complaining neighbour had unreasonable expectations and the evidence was insufficient.
Byles v Allaire
A Winchester tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment was denied, as the LTB found no serious error in the original decision.
Sabioncello v Taylor
A landlord's request for a review was denied after he missed the original hearing for a work project, as the LTB ruled this was not a valid excuse.
M&K CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v Csonka
Tenant's request for a review was denied after they missed a hearing for work, with the LTB ruling it was not a valid excuse.
Ottawa tenants awarded $7,583 after their landlord's failure to inform them about using a dehumidifier led to a severe mould infestation.
LTB denies a review request from a man who shares the same name as an evicted tenant, leaving him unable to clear his name despite claims of mistaken identity.
Landlord's eviction application for noise and dog complaints is dismissed after the LTB finds the complaining neighbour had unreasonable expectations and the evidence was insufficient.
Byles v Allaire
A Winchester tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment was denied, as the LTB found no serious error in the original decision.
Sabioncello v Taylor
A landlord's request for a review was denied after he missed the original hearing for a work project, as the LTB ruled this was not a valid excuse.
M&K CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v Csonka
Tenant's request for a review was denied after they missed a hearing for work, with the LTB ruling it was not a valid excuse.
Ottawa tenants awarded $7,583 after their landlord's failure to inform them about using a dehumidifier led to a severe mould infestation.
LTB denies a review request from a man who shares the same name as an evicted tenant, leaving him unable to clear his name despite claims of mistaken identity.
Landlord's eviction application for noise and dog complaints is dismissed after the LTB finds the complaining neighbour had unreasonable expectations and the evidence was insufficient.
Byles v Allaire
A Winchester tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment was denied, as the LTB found no serious error in the original decision.
Sabioncello v Taylor
A landlord's request for a review was denied after he missed the original hearing for a work project, as the LTB ruled this was not a valid excuse.
M&K CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v Csonka
Tenant's request for a review was denied after they missed a hearing for work, with the LTB ruling it was not a valid excuse.
Ottawa tenants awarded $7,583 after their landlord's failure to inform them about using a dehumidifier led to a severe mould infestation.
LTB denies a review request from a man who shares the same name as an evicted tenant, leaving him unable to clear his name despite claims of mistaken identity.
Landlord's eviction application for noise and dog complaints is dismissed after the LTB finds the complaining neighbour had unreasonable expectations and the evidence was insufficient.
Byles v Allaire
A Winchester tenant's request to review an eviction order for non-payment was denied, as the LTB found no serious error in the original decision.
Sabioncello v Taylor
A landlord's request for a review was denied after he missed the original hearing for a work project, as the LTB ruled this was not a valid excuse.
M&K CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v Csonka
Tenant's request for a review was denied after they missed a hearing for work, with the LTB ruling it was not a valid excuse.
Unlock Full Access to Richard Ferriss's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Richard Ferriss typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
The Maintenance Standoff: When Landlords Weaponize Repair Delays to Force Tenant Departures
Discover how some landlords deliberately delay essential repairs to make units uninhabitable, forcing tenants to move out. Learn the legal consequences and tenant remedies when maintenance becomes a weapon.
The Maintenance Balance: Understanding Reasonable Expectations Between Landlords and Tenants in Ontario
Explore the delicate balance between landlord maintenance obligations and tenant expectations through real LTB cases, learning what constitutes reasonable requests versus unrealistic demands.
The Maintenance Maze: Understanding Landlord Obligations and Tenant Rights in Ontario Rental Properties
A comprehensive guide to maintenance obligations in Ontario's rental market, exploring landlord responsibilities, tenant rights, common disputes, and how the LTB determines when maintenance standards have been breached.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform